Plastic creates ‘evolutionary trap’ for young sea turtles

The study, led by the University of Exeter, found plastic inside small juvenile turtles along both the east (Pacific) and west (Indian Ocean) coasts of Australia.

After hatching on beaches, sea turtles travel on currents and spend their early years in the open ocean.

But these currents now accumulate vast quantities of plastic and – feeding near the surface – many young turtles swallow it.

The research team included Murdoch University, the Department of Environment and Science (Queensland) and the Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions (Western Australia).

“Juvenile turtles have evolved to develop in the open ocean, where predators are relatively scarce,” said Dr Emily Duncan, of the Centre for Ecology and Conservation on Exeter’s Penryn Campus in Cornwall.

“However, our results suggest that this evolved behaviour now leads them into a ‘trap’ – bringing them into highly polluted areas such as the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.

“Juvenile sea turtles generally have no specialised diet – they eat anything, and our study suggests this includes plastic.

“We don’t yet know what impact ingesting plastic has on juvenile turtles, but any losses at these early stages of life could have a significant impact on population levels.”

Researchers examined juvenile sea turtles (from hatchlings to a shell measurement of up to 50cm) that either washed up or were accidentally caught by fishers on the Australian coasts.

In total, the study included 121 sea turtles from five of the world’s seven species: green, loggerhead, hawksbill, olive ridley and flatback.

The proportion of turtles containing plastic was far higher on the Pacific coast: 86% of loggerheads, 83% of greens, 80% of flatbacks and 29% of olive ridleys.

On the Indian Ocean coast, 28% of flatbacks, 21% of loggerheads and 9% of green turtles contained plastic.

No plastic was found in hawksbill turtles on either coast, but only seven hawksbills were found so this sample size was small.

Plastic in the Pacific turtles was mostly hard fragments, which could come from a vast range of products used by humans, while Indian Ocean plastics were mostly fibres – possibly from fishing ropes or nets.

The polymers most commonly ingested by turtles in both oceans were polyethylene and polypropylene.

“These polymers are so widely used in plastic products that it’s impossible to pin down the likely sources of the fragments we found,” Dr Duncan said.

“Hatchlings generally contained fragments up to about 5mm to 10mm in length, and particle sizes went up along with the size of the turtles.

“The next stage of our research is to find out if and how plastic ingestion affects the health and survival of these turtles.

“This will require close collaboration with researchers and veterinarians around the world.”

The study was funded by the Sea Life Trust and the National Geographic Society.

The paper, published in the journal Frontiers in Marine Science, is entitled: “Plastic pollution and small juvenile marine turtles: a potential evolutionary trap.”